Why has public trust in AI companies been declining or uneven?

A Documented but Nuanced Pattern

Survey research, including work from organizations like Pew Research Center, has documented that public trust and comfort with AI and AI companies is uneven, and in some specific measures has shown signs of decline or persistent unease, even as AI adoption and capability have continued to grow rapidly. This pattern isn’t simply a story of uniform distrust — rather, it reflects a more complicated public sentiment that mixes genuine interest in AI’s potential benefits with real and, in some cases, deepening concerns about how the technology is being developed and deployed.

Understanding why this unevenness exists requires looking at several distinct, commonly cited factors that researchers point to as shaping public sentiment.

Concerns Driving Skepticism

Job displacement concerns are among the most consistently cited factors shaping public skepticism toward AI and the companies developing it. As AI capabilities have expanded into areas of work previously assumed to require human judgment or creativity, concerns about economic disruption and job security have remained a persistent and salient issue in public opinion research, contributing to broader unease about the pace and direction of AI development.

Privacy concerns represent another significant factor, given that many AI systems rely on extensive data collection and processing, and public awareness of how personal data is used, stored, and potentially shared has grown alongside AI’s own growth. Related to this, some segments of the public express broader concerns about loss of human control or oversight as AI systems take on more autonomous or consequential roles in decision-making.

High-profile controversies or visible errors involving AI systems — whether related to bias, factual inaccuracy, privacy breaches, or other issues that receive significant media attention — can also have an outsized effect on public sentiment toward the broader industry, even when such incidents involve a specific company or product rather than AI generally. This pattern is fairly typical of how public trust operates for complex, unfamiliar technologies more broadly, where negative, salient events can shape overall perception more than the larger, less visible base rate of successful, unremarkable AI use.

Perceptions About Company Priorities

A further recurring theme in public opinion research involves perceptions that AI companies prioritize speed of development, competitive advantage, and profit over safety, transparency, and public accountability. This perception connects to broader public debates about AI accountability mechanisms, whistleblowing, and the adequacy of current regulation, and it appears to meaningfully shape how much trust segments of the public are willing to extend to AI companies as institutions, independent of views about AI technology itself.

Trust Varies, Rather Than Being Uniformly Low

It’s worth emphasizing that public trust in AI is genuinely uneven rather than uniformly low — research has generally found meaningful variation by demographic group, by specific country, and by the particular AI application being asked about, with some applications and contexts generating considerably more public comfort than others.

Bottom Line

Public trust in AI companies has been documented as uneven and, in some measures, declining, driven by a combination of concerns about job displacement, privacy, loss of human control, high-profile controversies, and perceptions that companies prioritize speed and profit over safety and accountability — though trust levels vary considerably rather than being uniformly low across all demographics, countries, and AI applications.

Go deeper

• What Are the Risks of Using AI for Public Health Surveillance?
• How Do Public Health Agencies Use AI for Resource Allocation?