What Are the Privacy Concerns of AI Monitoring in Elder Care?

Continuous Monitoring Means Continuous Data Collection

AI-based elder care monitoring systems are designed to track patterns over time, which by their nature means collecting an ongoing stream of data about a person’s movements, daily routines, and in some cases health-related metrics. This is inherently more personal and revealing than a single data point — over time, this kind of continuous data can reveal detailed patterns about someone’s habits, health status, and daily life. This raises legitimate privacy questions that apply to home monitoring technology more broadly, but that carry particular weight in the elder care context given the vulnerability of some individuals being monitored and the intimate setting — someone’s own home — where this monitoring occurs.

Cameras Raise the Stakes Considerably

Among the different monitoring approaches, camera-based systems generally raise more significant privacy considerations than non-visual sensors like motion detectors or wearable accelerometers. Video captures far more detailed and identifiable information, including moments that an individual might reasonably consider private, and raises additional questions about who can view footage, whether it’s recorded and stored or only analyzed in real time, and what happens to that footage over time. Families and caregivers considering camera-based monitoring specifically should weigh these heightened privacy considerations against the particular safety benefits a camera-based system might offer compared to non-visual alternatives.

Who Has Access, and What Happens to the Data

Beyond the type of data collected, important privacy questions center on data access and handling: who can view the collected data, whether it’s shared with any third parties such as the monitoring company itself or other services, how long data is retained, and what security measures are in place to protect against unauthorized access or breaches. These questions apply to essentially any connected home monitoring product, but carry additional weight in elder care given the personal and sometimes health-related nature of the information being collected, and because older adults being monitored may have limited ability to independently review or evaluate the privacy practices of the specific product being used on their behalf.

The Consent Question

A distinctive ethical consideration in elder care monitoring is ensuring the older adult being monitored has genuinely consented to the arrangement, rather than the decision being made entirely by family members without meaningful input from the individual themselves. Autonomy and the right to make decisions about one’s own privacy are important values, and monitoring — however well-intentioned — does involve a degree of ongoing observation that the person being monitored ideally understands and agrees to. This becomes more complex in situations involving cognitive decline, where an individual’s capacity to fully understand and consent to monitoring may be genuinely limited, raising the importance of involving appropriate family discussion, and in some cases established legal or healthcare decision-making processes, to navigate these situations thoughtfully.

Bottom Line

AI monitoring in elder care raises real privacy concerns, including the sensitivity of continuously collected personal data, heightened considerations around camera-based systems specifically, questions about data access and retention, and the importance of genuine informed consent from the older adult being monitored — considerations that families should weigh carefully alongside the safety benefits these systems can provide.

Go deeper

• Do Workers Have a Legal Right to Know If AI Is Monitoring Their Performance?
• What are the privacy implications of AI based employee monitoring software?
• What data privacy concerns come up when farms use AI monitoring tools?